Multiple opinions about the origin of the Sumerians
The Anunnaki and the true origin of the Sumerians, according to historians and their various opinions!!
* Dr. Sam Michaels Dr. Sam Michaels
The Sumerians are not attributed to the term "Semitic peoples", but rather to Turkish or Mongol linguistic origins. Some scholars said that their origin was from the Caucasus region (Caucasus), while others said that they came from the south of the Caspian Sea, and there are other statements saying that their origin was from Hungary, with evidence of similarity. Linguist What is strangest and even funny is that there are those who said that they came from outer space!!
The following books reviewed some of the opinions of leading experts and archaeologists, including the opinion of the writer (Hindcock), who said that the Sumerians came from the Elamite region (Elam).
Whereas the Sumerians and Elamites spoke a strange, non-Semitic language, and both of them inherited from the ancestors of the Elamites one common culture, and both of them used cuneiform writing! Also, “the Orientalist (Frankfurt) believed that the Sumerians were from the country of Elam, meaning that the Sumerians and the Elamites were both inhabitants of the swamps, that is, from the (marsh) region.”
As for the opinion of Dr. Samuel Noah Kramer, a professor of Sumerian, he says: The Sumerians were not the first to settle in southern Mesopotamia. The names of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, for example, do not belong to the Sumerian language, just as the names of the most important Sumerian cities such as (Eridu, Ur, Larsa, Adaba, and Lagash) do not belong to the Sumerian language. (Nippur and Kish) are words that do not have a Sumerian linguistic origin, but finally, researcher Kramer admits that he does not know the original homeland of the Sumerians! As for Henry Field. He says that the inhabitants of the marshes are the direct descendants of the Sumerians who lived in Iraq approximately five thousand years ago.
As Mahdi Al-Hasnawi says in his book [The Marshes, the Civilization of Sumer], where he says in his talk about the (Al-Sayamir) clan, that these people were descendants of the Sumerians, and their name was transferred from (Sayamer) to (Sayamer), and the name “Sayamer” goes back to “one of the rivers of Basra.”
John Sassoon mentions in his book [From Sumer to Jerusalem] that the antiquities that were discovered tell us that the cities of Sumer were demolished around 2,000 BC. After that, the Sumerians did not leave the land of Sumer alone, but rather left the entire Mesopotamian valley. Sassoon says that this group spoke the Akkadian language (which is a Semitic language).
As for the theory of migration from the Gulf, according to the historian (Brossus), it proposes that they came through the Gulf under the leadership of a leader called (Owans), and they came to Iraq from Bahrain in about the year 2,100 BC. Bahrain was known as (Dilmun), but the second theory of migration From India, according to Dr. John Al-Daraya, she says that their individuals’ features were very similar to the features of the inhabitants of (Afghanistan and Balochistan), the Indian Valley and Sindh, and they founded a civilization that lasted for more than three thousand consecutive years.
As for the historian (Obert 1,869 AD), through his comparison of grammar and vocabulary, he pointed out the close relationship of the Sumerian language to the Turkish, Finnish, and Hungarian languages. Then the historian (Lenormant) proved that Sumerian is the closest to the Finnish (Ugric) language, which is a branch of the group ( Turanism), and also "the historian Sandarkisuin 1,887 AD concluded" To the connection between the Sumerian language and Hungarian, the historian (Admahler 1,906 AD) came to the conclusion that the Sumerians, from an ethnic standpoint, were closest to the (Turanians) and considered them to be one of the ancient branches of the Turkic peoples! No research has appeared so far that disputes that the Sumerians do not descend from Turanian origin!!
Finally, it is noted that Sumerian constitutes a linguistic isolate, as does Elamite, but some linguists have noted that the closest languages to Elamite are the "Dravidian" language group of southern India. It is believed that the Aroma of the Dravidian languages was the language of all of India before the Aryans invaded India, but the Aryan influence was not complete in southern India. It is also believed that the language of the Indus Valley Civilization, which is called "Harpanic" Which ended with the Aryan invasion, was close to the Elamite language and the Dravidian languages!!!
To download the book The Lost Enki by Zecharia Sitchin
http://sooqukaz.com/index.php?option=com_edocman...